Painted cats

Posted by Dan on Nov 10th, 2008
2008
Nov 10

painted_cats_30

Reader CET sends an email full of pictures of painted cats.  Snopes says the pictures are fake; they’re taken from a 2002 coffee-table book, Why Paint Cats, The Ethics of Feline Aesthetics, by Burton Silver and Hilary Busch.  According to Snopes, it’s an elaborate send-up of both art books and cat books.  The book is a sequel to the 1994 book by the same authors, Why Cats Paint, A Theory of Feline Aesthetics.

You can see some of the pictures for yourself.  This is the comment I like best:

Anything to make those horrid, conceited creatures devoid of all dignity and self respect is fine by me.

I like the pictures, but I’m glad they’re fake.  I’m not an animal rights activist; I don’t get too upset when stray cats disappear from the alley behind the Chinese restaurant.  I do think that companion animals deserve to be treated with a certain amount of respect, if not for their sakes then for ours.

One Response

  1. connie Tolleson Says:

    A hoax? Oh, my! How disappointing. I have the “Why Cats Paint” book and I have been encouraging my felines to at least attempt to paint, with no success. I suppose I should have known it was a hoax when the last chapter was about the art of furniture shredding, which puzzled me at the time.
    The Charlie Chaplin rear end would have been difficult to paint - I have a hard time just cutting claws. I suppose I could douse them in paint (non-toxic) and use their little furry bodies as brushes.

Leave a Comment




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.